|
|
| Follow the links below to view the
BMUS 2009 Fetal Measurements Document |
| |
The BMUS fetal measurements document
is again available for download below following a re-evaluation and revision of
the CRL chart recommendations by the Fetal Measurements Working Party.
This publication is available as a PDF file. |
|
 |
|
If you do not have Adobe
Acrobat installed on your computer, use this button to download it before
clicking on any PDF links. |
|
|
 |
|
The Fetal
Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) has now published its final Ultrasound
Standards document. This includes the BMUS Safety Guidelines as an appendix.
Please click
here to
view this document on the FASP website. |
|
| Guest
editorial |
Pam Loughna, Senior Lecture/Consultant Obstetrician,
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology representative on BMUS Council. |
|
| BMUS fetal
biometry relaunch new improved version! |
|
BMUS published their first Working Party Report on
fetal measurements in 1990, at a time when the practice of obstetric ultrasound
remained varied, with obstetric units having quite widely differing protocols
for the number and timing of scans offered, as well as policies on re-dating
pregnancy from ultrasound measurements. That report offered recommendations for
the use of validated published tables and formulae for the commonly acquired
fetal measurements used in dating and monitoring fetal growth.
Since then, practice across England and Wales has become more uniform,
particularly following the publication of the NICE guidance on antenatal care1
(initially published in 2003) that recommended all pregnancies be dated by
ultrasound, and following the recommendations of the National Screening
Committee Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme regarding screening for Downs
syndrome.
BMUS accepted the need to review the old guidance, in order to ensure that the
statistical validity of the original recommendations remained intact. That
review, performed by Dr Lynn Chitty, Dr Trish Chudleigh and Dr Tony Evans, did
bring some changes to recommendations,most particularly that dating after 13
weeks be based on head circumference measurement rather than bi-parietal
diameter. The revised guidance was published in February 2007, and was widely
welcomed.
However, it was not long before problems arose with the crown rump length
formula. Whilst the formula recommended was in keeping with that used in many
obstetric ultrasound units, it quickly became apparent that the BMUS formula
was not the same as that used by the Fetal Medicine Foundation in their first
trimester programme. The difference, although small, was enough to alter the
estimated gestational age by a day or more, which is sufficient to
significantly alter the risk assessment for Downs syndrome based on
mid-trimester serum screening, giving screening co-ordinators a real headache!
The difference of a single day in terms of obstetric management is negligible,
but in relation to screening for Downs syndrome such variation could
change the assessment from low chance to high, or vice versa. After discussion
with the National Screening Committee, BMUS decided to withdraw the published
recommendations.
There followed a considerable amount of work by a relatively small group of
dedicated souls, chaired and led by Pat Ward of the National Screening
Committee which identified the lack of a perfect formula for calculating
gestational age from crown rump length. However, given the urgent need for
implementation of an agreed formula, the working group agreed to adopt the
best fit formula of
This formula has been accepted by all laboratories involved in Downs
screening, and is the formula used in the Fetal Medicine Foundation software
for first trimester screening.
All obstetric ultrasound units are recommended to adopt this method of
assessing gestational age from crown rump length, and it will now be necessary
for sonographers to check which formula is programmed into their ultrasound
machines and/or reporting packages. This should remove the confusion that has
been apparent over the last year or so, and ensure uniformity of dating for
screening purposes.
Work will continue to create the perfect formula so watch
this space!
Reference
1. National Collaborating Centre for Womens and Childrens Health.
Antenatal Care routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. NICE/RCOG
Press 2008. |
| |
|